Brind.
Entities  /  Entity

Michigan Department of Transportation.

government agency in Michigan

Seen in 73 reportsLast reported Monday

Reports this week
3
Active events
3
Connections
44

What's happening

Reports per dayLast 90 days
90 days agoDrag either end to show only events that began in that periodToday

One to three months ago

Around Michigan Department of Transportation this week

News at the entities that move Michigan Department of Transportation most

Connections

The 32 strongest of 44, analyzed from the reporting. The bars show how strongly a change on one side reaches the other.
Show all 32 connections
  • Macomb County Structural

    The two entities are functionally linked through the coordination of state and county funding for air base infrastructure upgrades.

    Some supportSep 6
  • Emmet County Structural

    MDOT provides funding and performs evaluations for road stabilization projects within Emmet County.

    Well supportedSep 3
  • Detroit Transactional

    MDOT contributed $25.6 million to a project impacting Detroit.

    Some supportSep 8
  • Portage Lake Structural

    MDOT is functionally responsible for managing the bridge infrastructure spanning Portage Lake.

    Some supportAug 25
  • Joe Biden Operational

    Operational agreements allowing surveillance originated during the tenure of Joe Biden's executive oversight.

    Some supportJul 28
  • Houghton County Road Commission Operational

    The two entities collaborate on a shared flood control infrastructure project.

    Some supportJun 30
  • Keweenaw County Operational

    MDOT's gas tax distribution networks operate, and their operational decisions regarding scenic routes affect the interests of Keweenaw County.

    Some supportFri 10:10
  • CDM Smith Transactional

    CDM Smith was awarded a $6.3 million contract by the Michigan Department of Transportation for a feasibility study.

    Some supportMon 14:56
  • Flock Safety Operational

    MDOT permits Flock Safety to use ALPR technology on its trunklines.

    Some supportJul 28
  • Wayne County Operational

    MDOT, as a state agency, interacts functionally with the governmental jurisdiction of Wayne County regarding operational matters like infrastructure issues.

    Some supportJul 4
  • The two agencies are actively cooperating to secure and implement infrastructure funding for trail improvements.

    Some supportJul 1
  • Cadillac Shared context

    Cadillac operates within the jurisdictional framework for road maintenance determined by the Michigan Department of Transportation.

    Some supportAug 1
  • Coldwater Shared context

    A is a location whose operational context is reflected in the maps of the state agency B.

    Some supportJun 10
  • Andy Operational

    MDOT approves local signs, but the city must provide the necessary funding for the project.

    Some supportSep 8
  • MDOT utilizes research from MSU regarding self-healing concrete for testing and potential adoption in infrastructure projects.

    Some supportJun 3
  • Lansing Shared context

    MDOT operates within the geographic context of Lansing, where a work zone crash was reported.

    Some supportJun 3
  • James Lake Shared context

    MDOT operates within the geographic context of James Lake.

    Some supportJul 8
  • Northern Michigan Shared context

    MDOT's operational area is geographically situated within the context of Northern Michigan, which is subject to regional environmental factors.

    Well supportedSep 9
  • Flint Shared context

    The Michigan Department of Transportation conducts infrastructure investment and resurfacing projects within the Flint area.

    Some supportSep 14
  • Antrim County Shared context

    MDOT is performing road maintenance and infrastructure investigations within Antrim County.

    Well supportedJul 18
  • Genesee County Shared context

    MDOT operates in the geographic region of Genesee County, specifically regarding infrastructure projects near Flint.

    Some supportAug 31
  • Muskegon County Shared context

    MDOT operates as the governing body responsible for the status of US 31, which passes through the county.

    Some supportAug 19
  • Clark Mentioned together

    MDOT reviewed the installation history of a wall, potentially involving Clark.

    Some supportJul 22
  • House of Flavors Mentioned together

    The single snapshot places House of Flavors near a high-speed area, but does not establish a relationship with the Michigan Department of Transportation.

    Some supportSep 8

History

Events by the month they began
Show 1 earlier month