A Constitutional Court ruling initiated an impeachment inquiry, leading the President to seek an urgent interdict in the High Court.
1 report, 1 independent
Updated Jun 18
AI-generated analysis. Brind wrote this summary from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.
What happened
A Constitutional Court ruling initiated an impeachment inquiry, leading the President to seek an urgent interdict in the High Court.
Who's involved
What this event is mainly aboutHow it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.- The President faces impeachment proceedings initiated by Parliament, alongside new jurisdictional rulings from the apex court.Sub-event
ConCourt ruling triggers impeachment inquiry against President Ramaphosa, leading to High Court action.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Cyril Ramaphosa
President of South Africa since 2018
-
constitutional court
court that deals primarily with constitutional law
-
high court
courts with higher status than some of other courts, sometimes refer to supreme court
Related events
- Impeachment proceedings, linked to the theft of US dollars, have led the president to seek a court ruling on the process.
- The Constitutional Court issued a ruling on the appeal of an inquiry interdict concerning the impeachment proceedings against President Cyril Ramaphosa.
- President Cyril Ramaphosa has sought judicial review concerning the impeachment inquiry proceedings.
- A High Court hearing is held to challenge the impeachment process involving President Cyril Ramaphosa.
- A court ruling dictates the impeachment process following the review conducted by the Ngcobo panel.