A council is considering the use of surveillance technology involving Flock Safety.
6 reports, 5 independent
Updated Aug 29
Gone quiet
Reached 2 outlets in its first 24 hours
- Reports
- 6
- Developments
- 4
- Repetition
- 83%
New informationRepeats or wire copies
AI-generated analysis. Brind wrote this summary from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.
What happened
A council is considering the use of surveillance technology involving Flock Safety.
Who's involved
What this event is mainly aboutHow it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.- Residents pushed back against surveillance technology while cameras were used to solve and respond to crimes.Sub-event
- A city council provided license plate reader technology to the city and subsequently set oversight measures for Flock Safety.Sub-event
- A city council voted on August 11, 2026, to add covers to Flock cameras used by the city.Sub-event
Council considers using surveillance technology with Flock Safety.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Flock Safety
American surveillance technology company
-
city council
legislative body that governs a city, municipality or local government area
Related events
- City council in Lynchburg reviews a contract for the use of surveillance technology provided by Flock Safety.
- Woonsocket City Council is considering protocols to regulate the use of surveillance cameras involving Flock Safety.
- The city of Chula Vista is evaluating technology from the controversial surveillance company Flock Safety.
- A city council voted to turn off Flock cameras after they were used by the city.
- Flock Safety is being used by an office to implement surveillance technology in the village of Fredonia.