Brind.

Study Examines Dividend Policy Performance Over 50 Years

3 reports, 1 independent Updated Sep 21
Gone quiet Reached 2 outlets in its first 24 hours
Reports
3
Developments
1
Repetition
67%

New informationRepeats or wire copies

AI-generated briefing. Brind wrote this from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.

What happened

Some supportReported by 1 outlet

A study published by Ned Davis Research examined dividend policy performance by analyzing 50 years of S&P 500 returns. The research found that companies which raised or initiated dividends produced an average annual return of 13%. This outperformed the 12.7% average return achieved by all dividend-paying stocks. Companies that paid but did not raise their dividends averaged 11.1% annually, while those who cut or eliminated dividends returned only 9.5%.

From fool.com

Why it matters

Some supportBrind's analysis of the reports

The findings suggest a clear pattern regarding the long-term performance advantage of dividend growth and initiation. The study provides historical data on how different dividend strategies correlate with average annual returns over a half-century.

From fool.com

Who's involved

  • Procter & GambleConsumer goods company whose dividend policy was analyzed in the study.
  • Johnson & JohnsonPharmaceutical company whose dividend policy was analyzed in the study.
  • NvidiaTechnology company whose dividend policy was analyzed in the study.
  • Micron TechnologySemiconductor company whose dividend policy was analyzed in the study.

Keep exploring

The entities involved

Related events

Coverage

Newest first; wire copies grouped
2 more outlets ran the same wire story