RAND Study Analyzes Fee Systems in Major Growth Areas, Including San Diego and Los Angeles
What happened
A new study by the RAND Corporation analyzed fee systems utilized in major growth areas, including San Diego, Palo Alto, San Francisco, and Los Angeles. The research found that fee systems implemented during the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s were designed to fund new infrastructure for sprawling growth. However, these systems are proving insufficient for maintaining infrastructure in already-developed areas.
From sdbj.com
Why it matters
The study highlights that while cities like San Diego have seen population growth, it is largely through infill development into existing infrastructure. The fee systems are legally restricted to building new projects and cannot fund the maintenance of aging public assets. This raises questions about how established cities can secure funding for necessary upkeep.
From sdbj.com
Who's involved
- RAND CorporationConducted the study on fee systems in major growth areas.
- San DiegoCity whose fee systems were analyzed regarding growth funding.
- Palo AltoCity whose fee systems were analyzed regarding growth funding.
- San FranciscoCity whose fee systems were analyzed regarding growth funding.
- Los AngelesCity whose fee systems were analyzed regarding growth funding.
How this reaches others
Each traced step by step, with the reporting behind itKeep exploring
The entities involved
-
San Diego
seat of San Diego County, California, United States; second-largest city in California
-
Palo Alto
city in Santa Clara County, California, United States
-
San Francisco
consolidated city and county in California, United States
-
Los Angeles
seat of Los Angeles County, and largest city in California, United States