Brind.

BorgWarner and Garrett Motion Classified as Consumer Discretionary

1 report, 1 independent Updated 00:00
AI-generated briefing. Brind wrote this from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.

What happened

Some supportReported by 1 outlet

Garrett Motion and BorgWarner were both classified as consumer discretionary companies. A comparison of the two companies showed that Garrett Motion has higher earnings but lower revenue than BorgWarner. Garrett Motion is currently trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BorgWarner, and 86.3% of its shares are owned by institutional investors, compared to 95.7% for BorgWarner.

From themarketsdaily.com

Why it matters

Some supportBrind's analysis of the reports

The comparison highlights differences in market risk and valuation between the two companies. Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.95, meaning its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. BorgWarner has a beta of 1.2, indicating its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

From themarketsdaily.com

Who's involved

  • BorgWarnerSubject to mandatory reporting and oversight by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Keep exploring

The entities involved

Coverage

Newest first; wire copies grouped