Concerns are growing about Flock Safety cameras in Pennsylvania, with lawmakers concerned about surveillance tools and local police using alternative systems like Motorola.
4 reports, 2 independent
Updated Aug 18
Gone quiet
- Reports
- 4
- Developments
- 2
- Repetition
- 50%
New informationRepeats or wire copies
AI-generated analysis. Brind wrote this summary from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.
What happened
Concerns are growing about Flock Safety cameras in Pennsylvania, with lawmakers concerned about surveillance tools and local police using alternative systems like Motorola.
Who's involved
What this event is mainly aboutHow it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.Lawmakers are proposing guardrails on ALPR use while the company is based in Atlanta.1 source
Lawmakers concerned about Flock cameras in PA; Rep. Takac warns about surveillance; local police use Motorola instead of Flock.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Flock Safety
American surveillance technology company
-
Paul Takac
American politician
Nothing else this week.
-
Pennsylvania
state of the United States of America
Related events
- Plymouth City Council in Minnesota has stopped using Flock Safety surveillance cameras.
- Police in Connecticut are using Flock Safety cameras, and the state is currently implementing privacy protections regarding their use.
- Flock Safety, a company providing ALPR services, is involved in a story about the expansion of its camera network and its use by law enforcement in Texas, alongside partners like Motorola Solutions.
- Flock Safety cameras utilize data from Connecticut residents, which is accessed by authorities in Georgia, while lawmakers discuss new bills to rein in the technology.
- The city of Springfield begins using Flock cameras for surveillance.