Concerns are growing about Flock Safety cameras in Pennsylvania, with lawmakers concerned about surveillance tools and local police using alternative systems like Motorola.
5 reports, 3 independent
Updated Aug 18
Gone quiet
- Reports
- 5
- Developments
- 3
- Repetition
- 40%
New informationRepeats or wire copies
AI-generated analysis. Brind wrote this summary from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.
What happened
Concerns are growing about Flock Safety cameras in Pennsylvania, with lawmakers concerned about surveillance tools and local police using alternative systems like Motorola.
Who's involved
What this event is mainly aboutHow it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.Lawmakers are proposing guardrails on ALPR use while the company is based in Atlanta.1 source
Lawmakers concerned about Flock cameras in PA; Rep. Takac warns about surveillance; local police use Motorola instead of Flock.1 source
Motorola is entering the police technology market amid citizen pushback against Flock Safety.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Flock Safety
American surveillance technology company
-
Paul Takac
American politician
Nothing else this week.
-
Pennsylvania
state of the United States of America
Related events
- Flock Safety, a company providing ALPR services, is involved in a story about the expansion of its camera network and its use by law enforcement in Texas, alongside partners like Motorola Solutions.
- Flock Safety uses cameras across Michigan.
- State law enforcement is now widely utilizing Flock Safety cameras across Georgia.
- Flock Safety cameras are being utilized by law enforcement in cities like Chicago and Boulder, where one camera recently aided a police arrest.
- Flock cameras collect data for Milford police and store it in Connecticut; a meeting has been announced to discuss the city's contract with the company.