Conroe city council reviews Flock Safety program costs and privacy, with John Sellars co-sponsoring the advisory committee proposal.
2 reports, 1 independent
Updated Aug 17
Gone quiet
- Reports
- 2
- Developments
- 4
- Repetition
- 0%
New informationRepeats or wire copies
AI-generated analysis. Brind wrote this summary from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.
What happened
Conroe city council reviews Flock Safety program costs and privacy, with John Sellars co-sponsoring the advisory committee proposal.
Who's involved
What this event is mainly aboutHow it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.- Conroe city council is considering fees to cover future infrastructure costs and operates under state government code.Sub-event
Conroe City Council rejects continued use of Flock Safety surveillance technology.1 source
- The city of Conroe is currently considering a binding proposition regarding the use of Flock Safety's camera systems.Sub-event
Conroe city council evaluates Flock Safety surveillance technology, including costs and privacy concerns.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
city council
legislative body that governs a city, municipality or local government area
-
Flock Safety
American surveillance technology company
-
Conroe
city in and county seat of Montgomery County, Texas, United States
Related events
- A council is considering the use of surveillance technology involving Flock Safety.
- Woonsocket City Council is considering protocols to regulate the use of surveillance cameras involving Flock Safety.
- Flock Safety was approved by the Pekin city council to provide cameras, funded by a state grant.
- Stillwater city council contracted with and installed Flock Safety cameras.
- City council in Lynchburg reviews a contract for the use of surveillance technology provided by Flock Safety.