Firms Oppose LightSquared GPS Network Over Interference Risks
What happened
LightSquared proposed setting up a new wireless broadband/satellite network across the nation using a frequency adjacent to the one used by GPS. This plan drew opposition from agricultural GPS providers and technology companies, who formed the Coalition to Save Our GPS. The Coalition estimated the plan could result in direct economic costs of up to $96 billion to U.S. commercial GPS users and manufacturers. LightSquared later announced a solution by moving to a lower frequency block, but critics argued this would not reduce interference for high-precision GPS uses.
From agwired.com
Why it matters
The conflict centers on the threat of GPS interference posed by LightSquared's proposed network. The opposition warned that the interference risk could lead to massive economic costs for commercial GPS users and manufacturers. This highlights the potential for disruption to industries that rely on precise GPS technology, such as agriculture.
From agwired.com
Who's involved
- DeereOpposed the plan due to threats of GPS interference.
- New HollandParticipated in the opposition coalition against the network plan.
- Leica GeosystemsOpposed the plan due to threats of GPS interference.
- GrowmarkWas part of the coalition opposing the GPS interference plan.
Who could feel it
Possible knock-on effectsThese are possibilities Brind reasoned out, not predictions, and not advice. Most are not stated in any report.
- agricultureSpeculative
The agricultural sector might face operational risk and market price changes due to GPS interference.
- Leica GeosystemsSpeculative
Leica Geosystems may face threats to core GPS reliability, impacting product sales.
- New HollandSpeculative
New Holland could face supply or operational risks as part of the opposition coalition.
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Deere
content creator
-
New Holland
company
-
Leica Geosystems
company