Brind.

Retrospective on 2018: Roundup, IARC, and Proposition 65 in California

1 report, 1 independent Updated Thu 22:04
AI-generated briefing. Brind wrote this from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.

What happened

Some supportReported by 1 outlet

A retrospective article published in 2018 discussed the use of Roundup in California, focusing on IARC involvement and the work of experts like Linda Birnbaum of NIEHS. The article detailed how a federal judge questioned why glyphosate should not have a warning label in California, despite the efforts of trial lawyers and environmental groups. This judicial discussion cast doubt on the validity of Proposition 65 itself.

From science20.com

Why it matters

Some supportBrind's analysis of the reports

The article noted that when Proposition 65 was passed, IARC was a legitimate body. However, the discussion highlighted that activist epidemiologists began influencing IARC around 2009. The court questioned whether California had shown that requiring the Proposition 65 warning for glyphosate directly advanced the law’s stated interest in informing residents about exposures to cancer-causing chemicals.

From science20.com

Who's involved

Keep exploring

The entities involved

Related events

Coverage

Newest first; wire copies grouped