Delaware Bans PFAS Firefighting Foam Amid DuPont Lawsuits
What happened
Lawsuits allege that DuPont was aware of the dangers associated with PFAS chemicals. Separately, Delaware lawmakers passed legislation banning firefighting foam that contains these toxic chemicals. Contaminated tap water supplies near military bases in Delaware were affected by PFAS runoff from firefighting foam used for decades in training and fire suppression exercises. The contamination has required millions of dollars to remove the chemicals from municipal water supplies.
From whyy.org
Why it matters
The legislation and ongoing lawsuits create regulatory pressure and potential liability for companies operating in Delaware. The contamination has already necessitated millions of dollars in cleanup costs for local water supplies.
From whyy.org
Who's involved
- DuPontCompany facing lawsuits regarding PFAS contamination in Delaware.
- DelawareState where the contamination occurred and where the firefighting foam ban was passed.
- Matt MeyerGovernor of Delaware who signed the legislation banning the foam.
Who could feel it
Possible knock-on effectsThese are possibilities Brind reasoned out, not predictions, and not advice. Most are not stated in any report.
- DelawareSpeculative
Delaware may face increased public liability and cleanup costs related to the chemical contamination.
Possible ripples
Who this could reach next, traced step by step from the reporting. Possibilities worth considering, not forecasts.- DuPont board faces increased risk from PFAS lawsuits and bansDuPont's board of directors must manage increased legal and financial risks from PFAS lawsuitsLikely
- DuPont's PFAS liability may shift competitive advantage to HoneywellDuPont's PFAS liability may shift competitive advantage to HoneywellPossible
- DuPont's PFAS liability continues to affect Carneys Point TownshipDuPont's PFAS liability continues to impact Carneys Point TownshipPossible
- Shared environmental liabilities may increase Corteva's PFAS legal exposureCorteva may face heightened legal exposure due to shared PFAS environmental liabilitiesPossible
- Supreme court may interpret corporate liability and state environmental lawsSupreme court may interpret corporate liability and state environmental lawsPossible