New Bedford City Council is drafting an ordinance to ban the use of Flock Safety surveillance technology.
3 reports, 2 independent
Updated Sep 9
Gone quiet
Reached 2 outlets in its first 24 hours
- Reports
- 3
- Developments
- 3
- Repetition
- 67%
New informationRepeats or wire copies
AI-generated analysis. Brind wrote this summary from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.
What happened
New Bedford City Council is drafting an ordinance to ban the use of Flock Safety surveillance technology.
Who's involved
What this event is mainly aboutHow it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.- Mayor Mitchell's desk received a ban ordinance in New Bedford.Sub-event
- New Bedford City Council considers removing or covering Flock surveillance cameras.Sub-event
New Bedford City Council is drafting an ordinance to ban the use of Flock Safety technology.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Flock Safety
American surveillance technology company
-
New Bedford
city in Bristol County, Massachusetts, United States
Related events
- Sterling Heights City Council extended its contract with Flock Safety on October 21, allowing the system to continue tracking vehicles.
- Minneapolis City Council is urging the end of contracts with Flock Safety, which currently uses cameras in the city.
- Virginia lawmakers passed usage restrictions for surveillance technology, and a City Manager addressed misuse detection concerns.
- Lawmakers in Congress proposed restrictions on surveillance technology provided by companies like Flock Safety and Motorola Solutions, while MapQuest integrated Flock data.
- League City is considering a referendum regarding the use of Flock Safety's camera systems.