Brind.

Greenpeace questions North Sea drilling approval, citing limited gas impact

1 report, 1 independent Updated Mon 00:00
AI-generated briefing. Brind wrote this from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.

What happened

Some supportReported by 1 outlet

Greenpeace UK released a briefing questioning the government's plan to approve more oil and gas drilling in the North Sea, focusing on the Jackdaw and Rosebank projects. The briefing details the potential climate and economic impacts of these projects, noting that Jackdaw's gas reserves would only reduce annual gas import dependency by 2%.

From greenpeace.org.uk

Why it matters

Some supportBrind's analysis of the reports

The briefing argues that burning the gas from Jackdaw would not lower international gas prices paid by UK consumers. Furthermore, the report projects significant global damage and heat-related deaths associated with the emissions from both Jackdaw and Rosebank.

From greenpeace.org.uk

Who's involved

  • ShellBritish multinational oil and gas company continuing North Sea drilling operations
  • EquinorNorwegian energy company continuing North Sea drilling operations
  • AduraClaims Jackdaw brings massive economic benefits
  • ToriesThe government whose regulatory approval of drilling is being questioned

Keep exploring

The entities involved

Related events

Coverage

Newest first; wire copies grouped