States Challenge Credit Rating Agencies Over ESG Predictions and Energy Risk
What happened
Twenty-two state financial officers sent a letter to S&P Global Ratings, Moody's, and Fitch Ratings demanding answers regarding their credit ratings. The complaint alleges that rating agencies used false ESG predictions, which treated American oil and gas production as a growing financial liability. The officers warn that these decisions threaten states' ability to pay for essential services and pensions.
From redstate.com
Why it matters
The complaint highlights that rating decisions, such as S&P Global Ratings giving negative credit outlooks to Alaska, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania in 2021, have impacted states tied to energy production. The officers state that flawed ESG predictions harm states' credit ratings and stock holdings, threatening public funding.
From redstate.com
Who's involved
Who could feel it
Possible knock-on effectsThese are possibilities Brind reasoned out, not predictions, and not advice. Most are not stated in any report.
- IowaSpeculative
Might face credit or funding issues due to the systemic failure of ESG ratings.
- ExxonMobilSpeculative
Could see increased perceived financial risk of fossil fuel operations due to flawed ESG ratings.
- ConocoPhillipsSpeculative
Could see increased perceived financial risk of fossil fuel operations due to flawed ESG ratings.
- Arizona Department of Health ServicesSpeculative
Might face jeopardized state funding for essential public health services.
- Maricopa CountySpeculative
Might face reduced local government revenue and operational funding due to state financial instability.