Brind.

Supreme Court Examines Bengaluru Premium FAR Scheme, Contrasts with Greater Noida Planning

2 reports, 1 independent Updated Thu 00:00
No new developments lately
Reports
2
Developments
1
Repetition
50%

New informationRepeats or wire copies

AI-generated briefing. Brind wrote this from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.

What happened

Some supportReported by 1 outlet

The Supreme Court critically examined Bengaluru's Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) scheme, which allows property owners to purchase additional construction rights by paying prescribed premium charges. The Court contrasted the scheme with Greater Noida, noting that the latter was planned with a 30-40 year outlook. The bench expressed concern that the scheme might strain Bengaluru's infrastructure, citing failures seen in Gurugram during heavy rains.

From rediff.com

Why it matters

Some supportBrind's analysis of the reports

The petitioners argued that the scheme might inadvertently regularize illegal constructions. The Solicitor General assured the Court that the scheme would not regularize unauthorized constructions under Akrama-Sakrama. The matter involves a plea challenging the order of the Karnataka High Court that had previously upheld the scheme's constitutional validity.

From rediff.com

Who's involved

  • BengaluruCity whose Premium FAR scheme is under judicial review
  • supreme courtHighest court reviewing the scheme and related pleas
  • KarnatakaState whose urban planning policies are being challenged

Keep exploring

The entities involved

Related events

Coverage

Newest first; wire copies grouped
1 more outlet ran the same wire story