California Food Labeling Debate Centers on GMO Requirements
The latest in this situation
How it started
What happened
Proposition 37, a ballot initiative in California, proposed mandatory labeling for genetically engineered food. If passed, it would have required food manufacturers selling products in the state to disclose if ingredients contained genetically modified, or GMO, components. GMO ingredients are estimated to be present in 75% to 80% of all processed foods in the U.S.
From emagazine.com
Why it matters
The California market, valued at $2 trillion, is large enough that changes in labeling requirements there would necessitate changes across the entire market. The initiative could have significantly impacted agro-chemical companies that grow commodity crops nationwide.
From emagazine.com
Who's involved
How it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.- The House of Representatives killed a labeling law that was intended to protect biotech interests regarding GMO products.Sub-event
- Monsanto and Bayer face scrutiny over the failure to label GMO products as promised, linking to broader food policy debates.Sub-event
- Standardizing food labels in California to reduce waste, co-sponsoring a bill on food waste.Sub-event
Historical context of GMO labeling laws and industry power in California and the U.S.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
California
former rapid transit station in Chicago, United States
-
Barack Obama
president of the United States from 2009 to 2017 (born 1961)