DEA Opposes Marijuana Rescheduling Hearing Citing Policy Gaps
- Reports
- 9
- Developments
- 1
- Repetition
- 89%
New informationRepeats or wire copies
What happened
The Drug Enforcement Administration opposed a motion to reopen the marijuana rescheduling hearing before Chief Administrative Law Judge Derek C. Julius. The opposition highlighted a Government Accountability Office report that found both the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Food and Drug Administration lack comprehensive policies for scheduling substances. The GAO report also directed the Food and Drug Administration to develop criteria for determining a substance's 'potential for abuse.'
From tennesseedaily.com
Why it matters
The findings expose a lack of written procedures within federal agencies responsible for drug control and approval. The Drug Enforcement Administration argued that this absence of procedures means there are no records to support the request to reopen the hearing. The DEA, Food and Drug Administration, and NIH concurred with the GAO's recommendations.
From tennesseedaily.com
Who's involved
- Drug Enforcement AdministrationUnited States federal law enforcement agency that opposed the motion regarding drug rescheduling.
- FDARegulatory agency found by the GAO to lack policies for conducting scheduling evaluations.
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Drug Enforcement Administration
United States federal law enforcement agency
- FDA