Solyndra and Moss Landing incidents expand risk categorization across technology sectors
What happened
Failures at Solyndra and the fire at Moss Landing are being used to define risks across broader technology categories. Cleantech public relations now relies heavily on proof, precise wording, and adherence to legal limits on environmental claims, according to reports. Directive (EU) 2024/825 has banned generic claims without proof of excellent environmental performance in EU member states since September 27, 2026.
From everything-pr.com
Why it matters
The incidents are highlighting risks within energy storage systems and increasing regulatory pressure on companies making environmental claims. This shift emphasizes the need for independent validation before announcing claims about emissions, efficiency, and cost.
Battery fires at Moss Landing are highlighting risks within energy storage systems.
From everything-pr.com
Who's involved
- SolyndraAmerican solar panel manufacturer noted for failing due to unverified claims.
- Moss LandingCensus-designated place in California where a battery storage facility operated by Vistra is located.
- VistraUS electricity company that operates a battery storage facility at the Moss Landing Power Plant site.
- TheranosDefunct American health-technology company noted for failing due to unverified claims.
- TeslaAmerican automotive and energy storage company facing scrutiny regarding greenwashing claims.
Who could feel it
Possible knock-on effectsThese are possibilities Brind reasoned out, not predictions, and not advice. Most are not stated in any report.
- TeslaSpeculative
Tesla may face increased compliance costs due to scrutiny over greenwashing claims from the FTC and EU.
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Solyndra
American solar panel manufacturer
Nothing else this week.
-
Moss Landing
census-designated place in Monterey County, California