Guttmacher Institute reviews Hyde Amendment, federal funding restriction
- Reports
- 4
- Developments
- 2
- Repetition
- 50%
New informationRepeats or wire copies
What happened
The Guttmacher Institute reviewed studies concerning the Hyde Amendment, a clause added to an appropriations bill by Henry Hyde, an Illinois congressman, fifty years ago. The amendment ensures that federal funds designated for health coverage cannot be used for elective abortions, despite ongoing legislative challenges to its existence. The amendment was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1980 in the case of Harris v. McRae.
From thefederalist.com
Why it matters
The Hyde Amendment remains a persistent federal restriction on funding for reproductive health services. This clause, which was enacted following the Roe v. Wade decision, continues to restrict how federal tax dollars can be spent by related agencies.
From thefederalist.com
Who's involved
- Guttmacher InstituteResearch and policy organization that reviewed studies on the Hyde Amendment.
- Henry HydeIllinois congressman who added the clause that became known as the Hyde Amendment.
Who could feel it
Possible knock-on effectsThese are possibilities Brind reasoned out, not predictions, and not advice. Most are not stated in any report.
- Planned ParenthoodSpeculative
Planned Parenthood might face limitations on funding access due to the persistent federal restriction on abortion services.
How it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.Henry Hyde proposed the Hyde Amendment, gaining support from Democrats in the House.1 source
Institute reviewed studies on the Hyde Amendment, referencing Henry Hyde's time as an Illinois congressman.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
Illinois
state of the United States of America
-
Henry Hyde
Nothing else this week.
-
Guttmacher Institute
research and policy organization