Brind.

Appeal Filed Against Oregon's EPR Law Challenging Fees and Supply Chains

1 report, 1 independent Updated Fri 00:00
AI-generated briefing. Brind wrote this from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.

What happened

Some supportReported by 1 outlet

The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors (NAW) has appealed a district court decision upholding Oregon’s Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act, the state’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) law. The appeal was filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. NAW argues that the law is unconstitutional and that the district court made incorrect legal conclusions regarding the matter.

From manilatimes.net

Why it matters

Some supportBrind's analysis of the reports

The challenge centers on the law’s requirement that fees be paid by wholesaler-distributors who do not control the final destination of the products. NAW contends that the EPR law disrupts nationally integrated supply chains, forcing multi-state companies to re-engineer operations or avoid Oregon entirely.

From manilatimes.net

Who's involved

Keep exploring

The entities involved

Related events

Coverage

Newest first; wire copies grouped