The Supreme Court reviewed pension appeals for retired Army personnel, with the Centre challenging orders, while Alok Aradhe served as a Justice on the bench.
Steady: 0 in the last 7 days
Updated sep 25
The latest in this situation
- 5-4 split decision established differential pay right in Feliciano case.
- Andrew Tutt argued the Feliciano case before the Supreme Court on September 23rd, concerning a ruling that affects Army reservists' pay.
- The Supreme Court reviewed pension appeals for retired Army personnel, with the Centre challenging orders, while Alok Aradhe served as a Justice on the bench.
How it started
AI-generated analysis. Brind wrote this summary from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.
What happened
The Supreme Court reviewed pension appeals for retired Army personnel, with the Centre challenging orders, while Alok Aradhe served as a Justice on the bench.
Who's involved
What this event is mainly aboutHow it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.- Andrew Tutt argued the Feliciano case before the Supreme Court on September 23rd, concerning a ruling that affects Army reservists' pay.Sub-event
SC reviewed pension appeals for retired Army personnel; Centre challenged orders; Aradhe on bench.1 source
Keep exploring
The entities involved
-
supreme court
highest court in a jurisdiction
-
Alok Aradhe
Judge of Karnataka High Court
-
Centre
department of Haiti
-
Army
senior officer in the Australian Army