How could the proposed constitutional amendments affect Governor Tony Evers' authority?
Amendment could limit Governor Evers' ability to use partial veto power Voters in Wisconsin are considering a constitutional amendment that would restrict the governor's ability to use a partial veto when it increases a tax or fee. This proposal is a direct response to Governor Tony Evers' use of his partial veto power to increase revenue limits on public schools by $325 per year for the next 402 years. If the amendment passes, it would add this restriction to the Wisconsin Constitution, limiting his authority going forward.
- Effect
- Mixed
- How direct
- Stated in the reporting
- When
- Within weeks
- The story
- No new developments lately
How it reaches Tony Evers
-
Wisconsin voters will consider three proposed constitutional amendments on the November 3 ballot. One amendment addresses the governor’s ability to use a partial veto when it would create or increase a tax or fee. Specifically, the question asks whether the constitution should be changed to limit the governor’s power to increase revenue limits on public schools by $325 per year for the next 402 years. A 'yes' vote would add this restriction to the constitution, while a 'no' vote would leave current authority unchanged.
The full event2independent outlets -
The proposed constitutional amendment would restrict the governor's ability to use a partial veto when it creates or increases a tax or fee. This is in direct response to Governor Tony Evers' use of his partial veto power to increase revenue limits on public schools by $325 per year for the next 402 years.
1 report connects these two. Brind only summarizes; follow a link to read the reporting itself.
- wxow.com Oct 5
-
Governor of Wisconsin since 2019
Everything about Tony Evers
Tap any step to see the evidence behind it.
The facts so far
As reported. Each one links to where it comes from.
- Voters will see three proposed constitutional amendments on their Nov. 3 ballot, including one dealing with the governor’s partial veto power.wxow.com
- The proposed amendment would limit the governor’s ability to use a partial veto when it would create or increase a tax or fee.wxow.com
- The amendment comes in response to Governor Evers’ use of his partial veto power to increase revenue limits on public schools by $325 per year for the next 402 years.wxow.com
Why it matters
The potential passage of this amendment represents a significant check on the executive branch's power in Wisconsin. If approved, it would legally restrict Governor Evers' ability to unilaterally lock in tax increases through partial vetoes, forcing the legislature to have a say in revenue increases.
This debate highlights a broader tension between executive flexibility and legislative oversight. While the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin opposes the amendments, arguing they reduce necessary flexibility, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty supports the change, arguing that no governor should lock in taxes for future generations without legislative input.
What we don't know yet
- Will the amendment pass the November 3 ballot?
- How will the legislature respond if the amendment passes and limits the governor's veto power?
Is this still moving?
- Reports
- 3
- Developments
- 2
- Repetition
- 33%
What would change this answer
— Other considerations
Beyond this explainer
Questions worth asking
Ideas the web ties closely to this story that the explainer doesn't mention. These are prompts for your own research: Brind hasn't answered them.
-
About Brendan
How might a specific individual like Brendan influence the legislative pushback against the governor's use of partial veto power?
Explore connected ideas
Each opens in Related concepts: what the web connects to it, with Brind's news on it.
The ideas come from how millions of web pages place them near each other. The questions are Brind's AI reasoning, written only from this explainer and Brind's own reporting.
Reporting
Keep going
Brind's analysis is written by AI from the reporting linked above and can be wrong. It is not investment advice; do your own research.