How could the Fraser Institute's job creation study affect the Canadian Taxpayers Federation?
New Fraser Institute data may strengthen Canadian Taxpayers Federation's critique The study provides the Canadian Taxpayers Federation with specific, recent data points to bolster its economic critiques. The research found that over the five-year period from 2019 to 2024, Canada added none in private-sector jobs per 1,000 working-aged people, compared to the United States adding 7.6. This finding, along with data showing nine provinces lost private-sector jobs, offers concrete evidence that the Federation can use in its anti-tax and policy advocacy efforts.
- Effect
- Mild negative
- How direct
- Stated in the reporting
- When
- Within weeks
- The story
- No new developments lately
How it reaches Canadian Taxpayers Federation
-
The Fraser Institute published a study comparing private-sector job creation in Canadian provinces and U.S. states over the five-year period from 2019 to 2024. The study found that the United States added 7.6 private-sector jobs per 1,000 working-aged people, while Canada added none. At the provincial level, British Columbia had the worst record throughout the Pacific Northwest, and Alberta was among the worst performers compared to other energy-producing states.
The full event1independent outlet -
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation utilizes research findings from the Fraser Institute in its shared anti-tax advocacy efforts. The study's specific findings, such as the fact that British Columbia lost the most private-sector jobs (35.7 per 1,000 working-aged people), provide new material for the Federation's economic critiques.
1 report connects these two. Brind only summarizes; follow a link to read the reporting itself.
- intelligencer.ca Tuesday
-
conservative advocacy organization
Everything about Canadian Taxpayers Federation
Tap any step to see the evidence behind it.
The facts so far
As reported. Each one links to where it comes from.
- The United States added 7.6 private-sector jobs per 1,000 working-aged people over the five-year period (2019-2024).intelligencer.ca
- Canada added none in private-sector jobs per 1,000 working-aged persons over the five-year period (2019-2024).intelligencer.ca
- British Columbia lost the most private-sector jobs, at 35.7 per 1,000 working-aged people.intelligencer.ca
- Nine provinces lost private-sector jobs per 1,000 working aged people over the five-year period.intelligencer.ca
Why it matters
For the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, this study provides concrete, recent data that aligns with its mission of economic critique. By highlighting Canada's poor performance compared to the United States, the Federation gains specific evidence to support its arguments regarding the effectiveness of current economic and governmental policies.
This research comes from the Fraser Institute, a non-partisan think-tank whose mission is to study the effects of government policies and entrepreneurship. The Institute's findings are often used in political discourse, and the data on provincial job losses contributes to the broader debate about the health of the Canadian labour market.
What we don't know yet
- How will the Canadian Taxpayers Federation choose to frame or utilize the specific provincial data?
- What response, if any, will the government issue to the findings regarding job creation?
What would change this answer
Who else could feel it
Other possible ripples from the same event.
- Justin TrudeauLikelyThe study could challenge the government's narrative on labor market health
- Government of CanadaLikelyGovernment of Canada may face pressure to adjust economic policies following job creation study.
- House of CommonsPossibleThe Fraser Institute study could influence House of Commons debates on economic policy
Reporting
- intelligencer.caTuesday
Keep going
Brind's analysis is written by AI from the reporting linked above and can be wrong. This explainer is a possibility worth considering, not a forecast: steps marked as Brind's reasoning are not stated in the reporting. It is not investment advice; do your own research.