How could the UN conference on biological diversity affect the Food and Agriculture Organization?
FAO's guidance on sustainable land use may face policy pressure from biodiversity critics The conference, COP17, is seeing strong opposition from Indigenous Peoples and civil society groups against monetizing nature and sacred animals as 'natural capital' for carbon and biodiversity markets. This criticism is aimed at market-based schemes that allow polluting industries, such as oil and mining companies, to greenwash their operations. As the Food and Agriculture Organization is central to global discussions on sustainable land use and food production, the contentious negotiations over biodiversity financing and the integrity of ecosystems could place policy pressure on the organization's existing guidance.
- Effect
- Mild negative
- How direct
- Brind's reasoning
- When
- Within weeks
- The story
- No new developments lately
How it reaches Food and Agriculture Organization
-
During the 17th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity in Yerevan, Armenia, Indigenous Peoples and civil society groups urged the United Nations to stop incorporating sacred animals and habitats into carbon and biodiversity credit schemes. They warned that this practice could accelerate biodiversity loss and allow polluting industries to portray themselves as environmentally responsible.
The full event1independent outlet -
During the conference, Indigenous Peoples and civil society groups strongly urged the United Nations to halt the monetization of sacred animals and nature as 'natural capital' for carbon and biodiversity markets. They warned that these market-based schemes could allow oil and mining companies to continue damaging the environment while portraying themselves as environmentally responsible.
No report states this step directly. Brind drew it from the reporting on each side of it, so treat it as an informed guess.
-
international organization with the objective of ending hunger
Everything about Food and Agriculture Organization
Tap any step to see the evidence behind it.
The facts so far
As reported. Each one links to where it comes from.
- Indigenous Peoples and civil society groups urged the United Nations to stop the use of sacred animals and their habitats in carbon and biodiversity credit schemes.allafrica.com
- The groups warned that such practices could accelerate biodiversity loss and enable polluting industries to continue damaging the environment.allafrica.com
- The concerns come amid contentious negotiations over Article 8(j) of the Convention, which calls on parties to respect, preserve and maintain the traditional knowledge, innovations and practices of Indigenous Peoples and local communities relevant to biodiversity conservation.allafrica.com
- Delegates at COP17 continue negotiations on how to implement the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which sets global targets for halting and reversing biodiversity loss by 2030.allafrica.com
Why it matters
The Food and Agriculture Organization plays a critical role in setting global standards for sustainable land use, which directly intersects with biodiversity conservation. The intense debate at COP17 highlights a fundamental conflict: how to mobilize necessary biodiversity financing without undermining conservation efforts or Indigenous rights. If market-based solutions are seen as enabling 'greenwashing' by extractive industries, it could force a re-evaluation of how global food and land policies are structured.
This pressure is not isolated to the CBD. The broader context involves major questions over which stakeholders should contribute to international biodiversity financing and how biodiversity action should align with climate commitments. The competing positions among delegates underscore the difficulty of balancing economic development with ecological integrity, a challenge that impacts all major international bodies like the FAO.
What we don't know yet
- Will the final negotiating text at COP17 include stronger language against market mechanisms that allow offsets for environmental damage?
- How will the Food and Agriculture Organization respond to the calls to halt the monetization of sacred animals and nature?
What would change this answer
Who else could feel it
Other possible ripples from the same event.
Reporting
- allafrica.comThursday
Keep going
Brind's analysis is written by AI from the reporting linked above and can be wrong. This explainer is a possibility worth considering, not a forecast: steps marked as Brind's reasoning are not stated in the reporting. It is not investment advice; do your own research.