- A Constitutional Court ruling initiated an impeachment inquiry, leading the President to seek an urgent interdict in the High Court.
- The President faces impeachment proceedings initiated by Parliament, alongside new jurisdictional rulings from the apex court.
The Constitutional Court issued a ruling on the appeal of an inquiry interdict concerning the impeachment proceedings against President Cyril Ramaphosa.
4 reports, 3 independent
Updated Sep 16
Gone quiet
- Reports
- 4
- Developments
- 2
- Repetition
- 50%
New informationRepeats or wire copies
AI-generated analysis. Brind wrote this summary from the reports listed below. It can be wrong. Each section says how much you can rely on it, and the sources are linked so you can check.
What happened
The Constitutional Court issued a ruling on the appeal of an inquiry interdict concerning the impeachment proceedings against President Cyril Ramaphosa.
Who's involved
What this event is mainly aboutHow it developed
Newest first. Tap a step to see who reported it.Judicial body issues warning regarding potential presidential misconduct.1 source
Constitutional Court rules on appeal of inquiry interdict during Ramaphosa's impeachment inquiry.1 source
Keep exploring
Part of
The President faces impeachment proceedings initiated by Parliament, alongside new jurisdictional rulings from the apex court.Also in this story
- An impeachment committee is investigating the president's conduct and seeking expert advice on due process while attempting to overturn a high court ruling.
- Cyril Ramaphosa filed a court application challenging a judgment issued by the Constitutional Court.
- Apex court's slow rulings set poor example.
- An investigation into Cyril Ramaphosa found prima facie evidence of misconduct, leading to a request for judicial review by the Constitutional Court.
The entities involved
-
Cyril Ramaphosa
President of South Africa since 2018
-
constitutional court
court that deals primarily with constitutional law
-
parliament
legislative body of government