How could the contradiction of Jobs' rejection affect Greg Joswiak's marketing strategy?
New high-end MacBook Pro may redefine Apple's niche superuser market The introduction of a touch screen on the new MacBook Pro, starting at $2,899, directly contradicts Steve Jobs' 2010 rejection of the feature for Macs. This high-end machine is specifically aimed at a niche group of superusers willing to pay a premium price. As SVP for marketing, Greg Joswiak would be instrumental in positioning this product, defining the value proposition for this specialized audience, and managing the market perception of Apple overcoming a foundational design constraint.
- Effect
- Mixed
- How direct
- 2 steps, 1 inferred by Brind
- When
- Within weeks
- The story
- Gone quiet
How it reaches Greg Joswiak
-
Apple Inc. released a new MacBook Pro starting at $2,899 that includes a touch screen with a PROLED XDR Display. This move contrasts with a 2010 rejection by Steve Jobs, who stated the company had contemplated but dismissed the idea for Macs. The new high-end machine is priced $900 more than the latest entry-level MacBook Pro.
The full event2independent outlets -
Steve Jobs stated in 2010 that while Apple contemplated touch screens for Macs, he rejected the idea, citing concerns that 'after an extended period of time, your arm wants to fall off.' Apple subsequently introduced a touch screen on a new MacBook Pro, a high-end machine starting at $2,899, which features a PROLED XDR Display and is aimed at a niche group of superusers.
2 reports connect these two. Brind only summarizes; follow a link to read the reporting itself.
- hindustantimes.com Oct 29
- livemint.com Oct 1
-
American multinational technology company based in Cupertino, California
Everything about Apple Inc. -
This product decision creates a specific market opportunity, as the reports note that while consumers like the option, only 11% buy a touch laptop and rarely pay extra for it. Greg Joswiak, as SVP for marketing, would be responsible for defining and communicating the value of this niche offering.
No report states this step directly. Brind drew it from the reporting on each side of it, so treat it as an informed guess.
-
American businessman
Everything about Greg Joswiak
Tap any step to see the evidence behind it.
The facts so far
As reported. Each one links to where it comes from.
- In 2010, Steve Jobs rejected touch screens for Macs, stating, 'after an extended period of time, your arm wants to fall off.'hindustantimes.com, livemint.com
- The new MacBook Pro with a touch screen starts at $2,899, which is $900 more than the latest entry-level MacBook Pro.hindustantimes.com, livemint.com
- The new MacBook Pro is aimed at a niche group of superusers willing to pay top dollar.hindustantimes.com, livemint.com
- IDC reports that only 11% of consumers buy a touch laptop and they rarely pay extra for it.hindustantimes.com, livemint.com
Why it matters
For Apple, the introduction of a touch screen on a premium machine represents a strategic shift, moving away from a long-held design philosophy established by Steve Jobs. This move allows the company to target a specific, high-value segment—the superuser—who is willing to pay a significant premium for advanced features. The success of this strategy depends heavily on how effectively Apple can market this niche appeal against the broader market resistance to touch functionality.
This product positioning is critical because it tests the limits of Apple's design orthodoxy. While the reports note that many Windows laptops have had touch screens for years, Apple is making a calculated move to integrate this feature into its high-end ecosystem. This move could signal a broader willingness by Apple to adapt to evolving user interaction preferences, even if the feature remains non-mainstream for now.
What we don't know yet
- Will the touch screen feature eventually trickle down to lower-priced MacBook models?
- How will the high price point of the MacBook Pro affect the adoption rate of the touch screen feature?
Is this still moving?
- Reports
- 2
- Developments
- 2
- Repetition
- 0%
What would change this answer
Who else could feel it
Other possible ripples from the same event.
Reporting
- hindustantimes.comOct 29
- livemint.comOct 1
Keep going
Brind's analysis is written by AI from the reporting linked above and can be wrong. This explainer is a possibility worth considering, not a forecast: steps marked as Brind's reasoning are not stated in the reporting. It is not investment advice; do your own research.