Brind.
From Wood Mackenzie: Battery Storage Cheaper Than Gas Turbines in 43 Markets

How could the shift toward cheaper battery storage affect ExxonMobil's gas operations?

Possible What happens if… A possibility worth considering, not a forecast.

Cheaper battery storage may challenge ExxonMobil's gas market position The Wood Mackenzie survey indicates a decisive economic shift in energy generation across 43 markets, including those in the Middle East and Africa. The report states that battery storage is now cheaper than open-cycle gas turbines, and predicts that in the Middle East and Africa, four-hour batteries will be 33% cheaper by 2035, displacing gas peaking on cost across every gas market in the region. Furthermore, the report notes that solar is now the cheapest form of new power in every market surveyed, and that the market for U.S. natural gas is expected to narrow in the coming decade. This trend suggests a long-term reduction in the demand for natural gas used for power generation, which is a core component of ExxonMobil's business.

Reported by 1 independent outlet Written Oct 9
Effect
Strong negative
How direct
Brind's reasoning
When
Over the long term
The story
Gone quiet

How it reaches ExxonMobil

Reported by news outletsBrind's reasoning

Tap any step to see the evidence behind it.

The facts so far

As reported. Each one links to where it comes from.

  • On every continent and in each of the 43 markets surveyed, four-hour duration batteries were less expensive than open-cycle gas turbines.techcrunch.com
  • In the Middle East and Africa, four-hour batteries will be 33% cheaper by 2035, displacing gas peaking on cost across every gas market in the region.techcrunch.com
  • Solar is now the cheapest form of new power in every market in Wood Mackenzie’s survey.techcrunch.com
  • The market for U.S. natural gas will narrow in the coming decade.techcrunch.com

Why it matters

For ExxonMobil, natural gas is a foundational element of its global energy portfolio and revenue stream. The structural shift detailed by Wood Mackenzie—where cheaper battery storage and solar power are displacing gas-fired peaking plants—represents a fundamental challenge to the long-term viability and profitability of gas assets. This trend is not limited to specific regions but is observed across the 43 markets surveyed, indicating a broad, systemic pressure on the fossil fuel power generation sector.

This transition is part of a wider global movement toward decarbonization, accelerated by falling technology costs. While gas turbines are currently being driven up in price by AI data center developers, the report shows that this cost increase is being countered by the rapid decline in battery and solar costs, suggesting that the economic shift toward renewables is decisive and widening.

What we don't know yet

  • How quickly will the cost decline of battery storage continue in the surveyed markets?
  • What regulatory measures will be implemented in the Middle East and Africa to manage the displacement of gas peaking plants?

What would change this answer

Battery storage costs decline faster than predictedThe displacement of gas peaking power will accelerate, increasing the negative pressure on ExxonMobil's gas market sooner than expected.
Governments subsidize natural gas infrastructure heavilyThe economic shift away from gas turbines could slow down, mitigating the long-term threat to ExxonMobil's gas operations.

— Other considerations

Beyond this explainer

Questions worth asking

Ideas the web ties closely to this story that the explainer doesn't mention. These are prompts for your own research: Brind hasn't answered them.

  • About EMEA Europe

    Given that the economic shift is observed across 43 markets, how is the energy transition progressing in Europe compared to the Middle East and Africa?

Explore connected ideas

Each opens in Related concepts: what the web connects to it, with Brind's news on it.

The ideas come from how millions of web pages place them near each other. The questions are Brind's AI reasoning, written only from this explainer and Brind's own reporting.

Who else could feel it

Other possible ripples from the same event.

Reporting

Keep going

Brind's analysis is written by AI from the reporting linked above and can be wrong. This explainer is a possibility worth considering, not a forecast: steps marked as Brind's reasoning are not stated in the reporting. It is not investment advice; do your own research.