Brind.
From Wood Mackenzie: Battery Storage Cheaper Than Gas Turbines in 43 Markets

How could the shift in power generation costs affect Shell's traditional operations?

Possible What happens if… A possibility worth considering, not a forecast.

Shell's fossil fuel operations may face long-term cost challenges Wood Mackenzie's survey found that battery storage is now cheaper than open-cycle gas turbines across 43 surveyed markets. This economic shift is predicted to displace gas peaking on cost in the Middle East and Africa, where four-hour batteries are expected to be 33% cheaper by 2035. As Shell operates within these gas markets, the increasing cost and declining competitiveness of gas-fired power generation could challenge the long-term economic viability of its traditional fossil fuel assets.

Reported by 1 independent outlet Written Oct 9
Effect
Mild negative
How direct
Brind's reasoning
When
Over the long term
The story
Gone quiet

How it reaches Shell

Reported by news outletsBrind's reasoning

Tap any step to see the evidence behind it.

The facts so far

As reported. Each one links to where it comes from.

  • Four-hour duration batteries were less expensive than open-cycle gas turbines in all 43 markets surveyed.techcrunch.com
  • In the Middle East and Africa, four-hour batteries will be 33% cheaper by 2035.techcrunch.com
  • Solar is now the cheapest form of new power in every market in Wood Mackenzie’s survey.techcrunch.com

Why it matters

Shell, as a major multinational oil and gas corporation, relies heavily on the continued demand and profitability of fossil fuels, including natural gas. The findings suggest a structural, long-term shift in global energy economics where cheaper, scalable renewable technologies like batteries and solar are directly undercutting the cost-effectiveness of traditional gas-fired power generation.

This trend is part of a wider global movement toward decarbonization, accelerated by rising energy prices and increasing electricity demand from sectors like AI data centers. The report also notes that the market for U.S. natural gas is expected to narrow in the coming decade, indicating broader market contraction for gas-based energy sources.

What we don't know yet

  • How quickly will the adoption of battery storage accelerate in the Middle East and Africa?
  • Will the rising costs of gas turbines lead utilities to accelerate investment in alternative power sources?

What would change this answer

Battery storage costs continue to decline rapidlyThe displacement of gas peaking on cost will happen sooner and more widely, increasing the negative pressure on Shell's gas assets.
Gas turbine manufacturers find ways to significantly reduce their procurement and operating costsThe economic gap between gas turbines and batteries may narrow, slowing the long-term decline in gas market viability.

— Other considerations

Beyond this explainer

Questions worth asking

Ideas the web ties closely to this story that the explainer doesn't mention. These are prompts for your own research: Brind hasn't answered them.

  • About EMEA Europe

    How does the energy transition in Europe compare to the trends observed in the Middle East and Africa regarding the displacement of gas peaking?

Explore connected ideas

Each opens in Related concepts: what the web connects to it, with Brind's news on it.

The ideas come from how millions of web pages place them near each other. The questions are Brind's AI reasoning, written only from this explainer and Brind's own reporting.

Who else could feel it

Other possible ripples from the same event.

Reporting

Keep going

Brind's analysis is written by AI from the reporting linked above and can be wrong. This explainer is a possibility worth considering, not a forecast: steps marked as Brind's reasoning are not stated in the reporting. It is not investment advice; do your own research.